设为首页    加入收藏   
首页期刊介绍编委会投稿须知稿约期刊订阅广告合作联系我们留言板

《中国冶金工业医学杂志》 欢迎访问,欢迎查询,欢迎引用!敬告作者投稿成功的标志是收到邮件回执。投稿出现问题邮箱wangtaohong@wangkantong.com,网站技术支持QQ1172987239。

本刊对投稿新要求:1.如果作者是第一次投稿,请务必用自己邮箱注册,并请认真填写作者单位详细通讯地址和第一作者手机,以便能及时准确收到杂志。2.文章必须有中文摘要,近5年参考文献至少3条。详见本刊投稿须知。本刊已同“中国知网”签订独家上网协议。

本刊2024年第2期杂志正在快递寄出,如果有作者没有收到杂志请与本刊编辑部联系,说明第一作者姓名和联系方式。

本刊2024年第2期杂志基本信息已经登载在本刊网站,欢迎读者、作者查询引用。

布托啡诺与曲马多用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后气管拔管的比较
作者:钟惠  周斌  尹亚岚  张桂翠  
单位:攀钢总医院麻醉科  解放军532医院麻醉科 
关键词:布托啡诺  曲马多  气管拔管 
分类号:R614
出版年,卷(期):页码:2010,27(1):19-21
摘要:

目的:探讨布托啡诺与曲马多用于腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)术后气管拔管的安全性及有效性。方法:选择腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者60例,随机分为布托啡诺组(B组)与曲马多组(T组),两组麻醉诱导方式相同。完成插管后,均采用丙泊酚加瑞芬太尼持续静脉泵注,间断推注维库溴铵,各组均于术毕即刻停药,拔腹壁套筒针时分别静注布托啡诺0.03mg/kg或曲马多1.5mg/kg。比较各时点血流动力学参数、血氧饱和度,记录麻醉恢复时间、术后不良反应。对拔管后(5′、15′、30′)行镇静(Ramsay)及舒适(Bcs)评分。结果:与注药前(T0)后(T1)5min相比,拔管即刻(T2)两组MAP、HR有所升高但无差异性(P>0.05),其余各时间点MAP、HR无明显变化。术毕B组自主呼吸恢复、睁眼、拔管时间略长于T组,但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。不良反应:拔管期间B组有1例躁动占3%,T组有4例躁动占14%,组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。Ramsay评分:拔管后B组镇静效果明显高于T组(P<0.05);Bcs评分两组无差异性。结论:布托啡诺能安全、有效地用于LC患者围拔管期的镇痛和镇静,术后不良反应发生率低,患者舒适、满意。

Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of Butorphanol and Tramadol used in the tracheal extubation of postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).Methods:60 patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into Butorphanol group(B group)and Tramadol group(T group),and used the same method of anesthesia induction between the two groups.After intubation,continuous infusion of propofol with remifentanil and vecuronium was injected intermittently for ,and were stopped immediately after operation.When the sleeve was extracted,the Butorphanol(0.03 mg/kg)and Tramadol(1.5 mg/kg)were injected respectively for the two groups.The parameters of hemodynamics,oxygen saturation,anesthesia recovery time and postoperative side effects were recorded in different points of time.The Sedation score(Ramsay)and comfort score(Bcs)were recorded on post-extubation(5',15',30').Results:MAP and HR of the two groups had the trend of increase at the moment of extubation(T2)but no significant difference(P>0.05)compared with T0(before injection) and T1(5mins after injection).MAP and HR had no significant change at the other time.The time of B group's resumption of spontaneous breathing,eyes open and extubation were longer than T group's,but no significant difference(P>0.05).Adverse reactions:During extubation,there were one patient(3%)of B group and four patients(14%)of T group having restlessness.There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Ramsay score:After extubation,the sedative efficacy of B group was significantly better than T group (P<0.05);Bcs score of the two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusions:The safety and efficacy were affirmatory for analgesia and sedation in period of extubation of LC.There were low incidence of adverse reactions after operation.Patients feel comfortable and satisfactory.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:
中国学术期刊网络出版总库
共找到 3 条记录
中国图书全文数据库
共找到 1 条记录
  •  
    [1]. 俞卫锋主编. 麻醉与复苏新论[M]. 第二军医大学出版社 2001
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
友情链接   中国知网-中国冶金工业医学杂志 搜狐邮箱 中国知网 中华预防医学会网站 国家新闻出版总署 博文采编官方网站 CNKI翻译助手 网易VIP163邮箱 网易126邮箱 网易163邮箱 雅虎邮箱 新浪邮箱 QQ邮箱 鞍钢总医院网站 丁香园 好医生 疾病查询

《中国冶金工业医学杂志》
编辑部地址:辽宁省鞍山市铁东区健身街3号(鞍钢总医院院内),邮编114002
电话:0412- 6327774 ,0412-6706630,传真:0412-6327774
网址:www.zgyjgyyxzz.com  邮箱:yjyx1984@vip.163.com
京ICP备10041176号