Abstract: ObjectivesTo compare surgical safety and clinical effects in short term of laparoscopic and traditional open radical resection of right colon cancer D3 surgeryMethods63 cases of laparoscope right hemicolon carcinoma D3 radical excision as observation group and 56 cases of traditional open abdomen right hemicolon carcinoma D3 radical excision as control group in our hospital from March 2012 to October 2014 were retrospective analyzedOperation conditions,functional restorations after operation,postoperative complications,and local recurrences and metastasis after operation of both groups were comparedResultsBleeding volume during operation,intestinal exhaust time and stay length of observation group were obviously less than those of control group(P<001)The incidence rate of postoperative complications in observation group was obviously lower than that in control group(P<001)While there were no significant differences of local recurrence rates and distant metastasis rates in both groups (P>005)ConclusionsCompared with traditional open abdomen right hemicolon carcinoma radical excision,laparoscope assisting right hemicolon carcinoma radical excision has advantages such as less bleeding volume during operation,quicker intestinal functional restoration,lower complications rate and shorter stay lengthIts short term effects were correspondent to traditional open abdomen operation
Key Words:Laparoscope; Right hemicolon carcinoma D3 radical excision; Colon malignancy